Wellington Boone was wrong. Or was he?
He had said, in the space of 200 pages or so, that if a man will go out of his way to serve others, then others will acknowledge the effort in like manner, i.e. the natural response to giving is to give in return.
Now, having afforded the theory a trial run of some 10 years' duration, I can say nothing other than that the results have consistently failed to support the hypothesis. Rather, extravagant giving would appear to create in others an extravagant appetite for receiving.
People do not see the force of will behind self-effacement. They simply conclude that you are weak. They do not see the strength in forbearance. They simply conclude that you are foolish. They do not understand that generosity is powered by love, nor that true love elevates the one who is loved above the common elements of personal recompense.
I have become, therefore, the proverbial doormat. Or so they will say, even as they continue to benefit by every property they have deemed foolish, weak, callow, obtuse.
What's up with that, Mr. Boone?
The answer, as it happens, is a bit beyond the mere ink that ended up on the page.
1 comment:
Somewhere in that information should be a proviso to expect nothing in return. Then you are free to practice without regret, remorse or unmet expectations.
Having said that, I also have experienced what you say but I've also had the pleasure of sweet acknowledgment in regards to loving and giving.
I wish you more of that in your life. I, for one, appreciate you!
Post a Comment